| UNITED NATIONS
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Microfinance
Issue 9 / February 2005
Featured Guest: Ambassador Rezlan
Jenie, Indonesian Ambassador to the United Nations:
On Tsunami Relief, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Indonesia
Q: Indonesia has suffered terribly as
a result of the tsunami in the Indian Ocean. The world has responded
by mobilizing donations for the relief effort. What do you think is
the best use of these funds?
A: This disaster has triggered a large outpouring of
donor assistance and while we wholeheartedly appreciate this assistance,
it inevitably creates coordination problems. We do not want to risk
either the relief or reconstruction efforts. Hence, the Coordinating
Minister for People’s Welfare was in Aceh for the first few days
and our government has asked the United Nations and UNDP to support
the National Coordinating Board for Disaster Management (BAKORNAS) in
coordinating donor support for the emergency relief and initial rehabilitation
efforts.
The Government of Indonesia, supported by major donors such as the World
Bank, the ADB, and major donor countries, is leading the subsequent
rehabilitation and reconstruction phase. To ensure transparency and
accountability, the Government of Indonesia has appointed Price Waterhouse
Coopers in the effort to help improve the tracking of emergency assistance
provided by donors.
Our efforts are being guided by the following key principles. We do
not want to simply re-establish the devastated areas, but rather improve
the lives of the people based on a comprehensive and holistic design.
As we do this, we are committed to listening to the aspirations of the
people. It is important to consider these feelings as having a share
in rebuilding their lives. We are also mobilizing various experts, including
geological experts to rebuild safe and sustainable communities. To achieve
this, we have established clear direction, including coordination between
sectoral and regional programs at the national and local level. The
government is mandated in our constitution to protect and provide for
the widows and orphans left behind by the Tsunami and we will make special
efforts to address their needs. We have established a joint center,
including line ministries and donors to complete the needs assessment
plan. The plan focuses on restoring people’s livelihoods, and
effective local administration, as well as public infrastructure and
services.
Q: As the initial emergency stage passes, what
strategies is the Indonesian government considering to rebuild?
A: We are dividing the task into three phases. Relief,
rehabilitation and reconstruction. The immediate humanitarian relief
operation lasted for two months and was dominated by emergency operations.
The rehabilitation phase has been taking place and would last for another
year and one half. This phase should allow us to restore services to
the minimum levels required. We expect that the full reconstruction,
and therefore recovery will be a process taking at least five years.
The challenge at this point is to deal with more than six hundred thousand
people who are homeless or badly affected by the disaster, including
the provision of water, food and basic shelter while electricity, communications
and transport are being restored.
The government has split the oversight of this recovery effort into
several parts. First, the National Coordinating Board for Disaster Management
(BAKORNAS) and the operational direction of the Coordinating Minister
for Social Affairs have the main duty of mobilizing all the resources
of the government, including the military. They are also responsible
for the coordination of the extensive domestic and international relief
effort. Developing the longer run rehabilitation and reconstruction
effort has been assigned to the National Development Planning Agency
(BAPPENAS). The Coordinating Ministry for the Economy will focus on
overall coordination as we restore economic activity in Aceh and North
Sumatera.
Q: In the face of such devastation, it must
be difficult for financial institutions to avoid falling into the charity
role. How did local financial institutions react initially? What challenges
are they facing now?
A: Our strategy has a number of elements. First, given
pressing budget problems, we are looking to use as much as possible,
grant or highly concessional financing. More specifically, we will be
looking at existing government and donor projects and restructure them
in a way so that they match the present needs in the affected areas.
This is the fastest way to deliver effective assistance through proven
mechanisms. Second, we will look at new programs to redesign them to
better match the needs in the affected areas. Third, we will be looking
carefully over our entire portfolio of existing projects for those with
unallocated or even contingency funds to assess how much of this money
can be reallocated. Finally, given dimension of the disaster we will
of course be assessing what new financing we might need, probably financed
through a new multi-donor Reconstruction Fund. Such a multi-donor trust
fund would have a number of advantages. It would allow us to use Existing
budget mechanisms, project design, procurement etc. and would simplify
the government’s management task, as compared to dealing with
each donor separately. It will take some work to develop planning and
governance structures and we would be interested in the experience of
others on this issue.
Q: What role do you think micro-finance can
and should play in the post-disaster efforts?
A: One of the most important and difficult challenges
facing the affected areas will be rebuilding the income generating activities
both in rural and urban areas. The government has the challenge of designing
productive reconstruction strategies that take into account the different
characteristics of rural and urban economies. Furthermore, there is
tremendous emotional trauma and loss of confidence that survivors of
the disaster have to overcome. This is because the communal networks
and mutual self-help systems of communities built up over generations
were instantly wiped out before their very eyes, leaving many helpless
and vulnerable.
However, despite all the traumatic experience that the victims had to
sustain, the desire to start working and rebuilding is apparent. Markets
have reopened while not as extensive as prior to the tsunami. There
are even individuals who are keen to have access to their bank accounts
with the goal of restarting business operations. This is why revitalizing
income generating activities is important in the rehabilitation and
reconstruction phase so that activities that were a day-to-day occurrence
prior to the tsunami become visible and people can build on a platform
that would help them regain a sense of normalcy. Microfinance in this
regard, has a very important role to play. I would like to bring your
attention to three areas which microfinance can have an influence in.
The first is the vulnerable populations, which comprises of single mothers
and orphans. In a recent study done on surviving mothers and newly widowed
women in the affected areas, there were three sectors in which the women
were involved in and they include agriculture, trade and services. There
were also women who made an income through self-employment. In this
case, what the single mothers will need is access to micro-financing
ideas and know how so that they can have a choice as to what they would
like to do.
This brings me to my other two points. The agricultural and fisheries
sector was heavily affected by the tsunami. While it is true that much
of the soil for agriculture is either permanently damaged or may need
years to fertilize again, and many of the fishermen are tempered with
fear not only due to trauma but also because of declining fish stocks.
It does not necessarily mean that these sectors will die away. In fact,
the government has envisioned a strategy that should revitalize these
areas. In this context, micro-finance can resuscitate the much-needed
local income from these activities because of the low repayment rates
and the low risk.
In trade and services, the government is promoting a local economic
revival strategy that should focus on the promotion of micro or small
enterprises. It is expected that many people will turn to micro-enterprise
activities to generate income during the rehabilitation phase. Special
attention must be given to women entrepreneurs as they commonly constitute
the largest number of micro-entrepreneurs yet are the most disadvantaged
in terms of access to productive resources.
In all three areas, the government will use community based approaches
and the mass media to reach out to the people.
Q: Is there anything else you would like to comment on?
A: We are touched by the response from the international
community in the face of this tragedy. We also greatly appreciate the
outpouring of support and assistance from our friends in the international
community and our hope that this turns into concrete action to deal
with the problem and mitigate future impacts. As the President of Indonesia
indicated, this is an opportunity for all of us to work toward a better
future not only for our countries, but for the region and the world.
|