
|
Statement by New York, 10 May 2004
I would also like to acknowledge the presence of Senior Minister Ana Pessoa Pinto. I would like to thank the SRSG Mr. Kamalesh Sharma for his important statement. Let me at the outset congratulate you for assuming the Presidency of the Council for this month. My delegation is always pleased to participate in discussions of the Security Council on the United Nations Mission of Support in East Timor (UNMISET), the present mandate of which ends in 10 days. I would also like to thank the Secretary-General
for his report (S/2004/333), in which he observes that the relationship
between Timor-Leste and Indonesia has continued to benefit from the
commitment to cooperation at the highest political levels. From the
very beginning, the leaderships of both nations agreed to cooperate
on the basis of forward-looking and reconciliatory policies, a visionary
and realistic approach that has served both nations well. It has led
to peace in the area, and has enabled both Timor Leste and Indonesia
to focus on development and on the best interests of their peoples.
There are some other issues in the report that we would like to comment. With regard to the issue of border, in paragraph 11 the report while acknowledging the significant technical work that has been accomplished also alluded that finalization of an agreement on a borderline has remained elusive and for which further input is expected from Indonesia. We see this as an inaccurate and one-sided view and reflect the lack of understanding with regard to the issue. For the Council’s information,
the Technical Sub-Committee of Border Demarcation and Regulation,
as part of the Joint Border Committee, since December 2001 has held
meetings for 11 times, and each meeting was always being preceded
by a joint field survey. Indonesia has been always supportive to every
activities aimed at finding a solution to the determination of borders
between Indonesia-Timor Leste and also all kind of community activities
residing along the border. With regard to paragraph 13, on the problem of the so called “former refugees”, first of all I would like to restate that there are no more Timor-Leste refugees in Indonesia since December 2002 when more than 200,000 refugees had returned voluntarily to Timor-Leste. From the registration process conducted by the Government of Indonesia from August until November 2003, the fact shows that there are about 125,342 East Timorese living in nine provinces and 61 regencies throughout Indonesia. From this figure 113 people opted to return to Timor Leste, and the Government will render its facilitation to help them. In addition, out of 125,342 Timorese who live in Indonesia, 28,000 of them live in East Nusa Tenggara (West Timor) province, but not in “camps” as the report suggested. They opted to stay in Indonesia as citizens and are being offered to be relocated within Indonesia. However, the Government is always ready to render its facilitation if they voluntarily decide to return to Timor-Leste at any time. In relation to this issue, I also
need to draw the Council’s attention that the continued use
of the term of East Timorese “former refugees” is sending
a wrong notion as if there are still some problems related to security.
They are not posing security threats. In this regard, it should be
noted that the Government of Indonesia has taken some important measures
to address security matters, including sweeping and confiscating of
weapons in the border area by Indonesian police and armed forces,
which in return have been destroyed by the authorities witnessed by
UNMISET representatives. Continuous checking from time to time is
being conducted by the security apparatus in West Timor. As a matter of fact, there has not been any report of incident along the border since 2001 and this clearly shows that security has been greatly improved along the border. I wish also to bring to the attention
of the Council that the outdated and unnecessary retention of the
Phase 5 security situation rating in West Timor, unilaterally imposed
since 2000, has prevented the access and operations of international
agencies and NGOs in this process and hampered their humanitarian
programs. Thank you, Mr. President.
|