
| Statement by New York, Feb 6, 2007 Madam President, Indonesia associates itself with the statements made by the distinguished representatives of Jamaica on behalf of NAM, as well that of Slovakia, in his capacity as the President of the Security Council for the month of February. Before the institution of the PBC, there was an acute need for a single forum that could facilitate an effective interplay between the relevant international and national actors on how to best address the requirements of the post-conflict situations, and prevent them from relapsing into conflict. This critical gap in the international support system was highlighted by our leaders when they called for the creation of the PBC at the 2005 World Summit. The Commission still passes through
the teething stage, but the expectations from it are high. It is therefore,
our common responsibility that we nurture the Commission, and full
support is extended from the General Assembly, the Security Council,
and the ECOSOC. The coordination between the pertinent institutions, including the UN bodies, needs to be enhanced. It has been the experience that at times, it is not done in a systematic way with the involvement of all related parties, and their requisite commitment to follow through. In this regard, we like to underline that by carrying out coordination, the work of the PBC should neither create further complexity for the existing processes nor lead to micro-managing the activities being carried out in the countries concerned. The priorities setting in the post-conflict recovery phase should be established by the national governments under consideration. The national ownership is paramount. A coherent, organised, and yet flexible,
international support mechanism through the Commission, would facilitate
better access and response for the countries in need with improved
results. It is very important that the international community work with the national authorities in the post-conflict countries, with particular attention to assist them for building the institutional capacities in their priority sectors. The focus should be on developing an economic model and peace that are sustainable. Considering the multidimensional nature of the occurrence of conflicts, it is imperative that the PBC take a comprehensive approach when proposing integrated peacebuilding strategies. In this context, the ECOSOC has an important role to play, particularly with the technical capabilities of its various functional and regional commissions, and other subsidiary bodies. There needs to be regular interaction between the PBC and the ECOSOC where relevant lessons learned and best practices can be shared. The ECOSOC may wish to take up the
topic of ‘post-conflict recovery’ as its theme at the
Annual Ministerial Reviews in the future. We believe that our common
goal should be to mobilise the whole institutional machinery of the
UN to promote an across the board approach that addresses the difficult
issues in post-conflict situations. Madam President, We regard the work of both Organisational Committee and Country Specific configurations as seminal. The success in one aids the other. It is incumbent upon us that we support both. However, the Organisational Committee has a broader purview. A properly empowered and robust Committee will serve to strengthen the work of the Commission as a whole. There also needs to be a closer working relationship between the PBC and the PBSO for greater coherence and effectiveness. As a member of the PBC, we stand ready, to shoulder our responsibility to contribute, in generating more concrete and practical outcomes of the Commission.
|