Statement by
H.E. Mrs. Adiyatwidi Adiwoso Asmady
Deputy Permanent Representative
Before
The Informal Meeting of the Plenary on
the United Nations Millennium Project 2005
New York, 10 February 2005
Mr. President,
Allow me to begin by expressing our appreciation to you for convening
this informal consultation to deliberate further on the UN Millennium
Project 2005. We share the Jamaica's views, speaking on behalf of
the G-77 and China, on the report and indicate our recognition that
it is an important document which needs further discussion and Possible
elaboration.
Mr. President,
There is little doubt in our mind that the report is well-intentioned
and does indeed serve as a catalyst to encourage positive action at
the international level to bring about change and progress in all
regions of the world. In no way can the report be considered bold
in its contents but perhaps it should have been more courageous in
indicating exactly how it proposes to get countries to fulfil their
commitments so that the MDGs can be achieved.
Not for the first time we have had a sound report on what should be
done to make the future better for all nations of the world. And,
certainly, almost all of the recommendations of the Millennium Project
dovetail with the policies, plans and programmes of the developing
world designed for economic and social progress. This is not to say
that the report is perfect in every respect but merely to say that
it easily meets the criterion of acceptability by most nations and
regions.
However, we return to the issue of commitment closely linked to implementation.
Our most urgent concern is how this report, which stakes a claim to
being a practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals,
will move from the realm of ideas to the realm of action, both from
developed and developing countries. On this critical matter, the report
is silent.
We know that commitments have been made throughout the 1990s and even
at the beginning of the 21st century but we are yet to see the decisive
action that clearly demonstrates the good faith that accompanied those
commitments.
Now we hear a great deal about donor fatigue. We see the resistance
that is being made to the elimination of agricultural subsidies, the
unwillingness to adjust the multilateral trading and financial systems
and wonder whether optimism in such a global environment and atmosphere
is misplaced. Nevertheless, we are not prepared to surrender to pessimism.
Our wish is for the political will to be displayed and for the necessary
action to be taken by those in a position to influence the course
of global economic history. If the will is there, then the way forward
can be found.
Mr. President,
Indonesia takes comfort in the outpouring of support and goodwill
that followed the devastation occasioned by the tsunami in December.
The evidence of that experience confirms the truth of the claim that
the Millennium Project report could be given life sooner, certainly
within the established deadlines, rather than later, at some uncertain
point in the future.
That having been said, Indonesia wishes to point out certain factors
that should be given serious consideration when implementing the Millennium
Development Goals. In the first place, it may be unwise to equate
development with achievement of the MDGs, which after all, cannot
be all things to all nations. The scope for development should be
much broader than the scope of a single report, because the wisdom
and insights of the world cannot be concentrated in a single document,
however detailed that document may be.
In this context, Indonesia would like to emphasize that the solution
of all development problems should not be construed as being based
on the achievement of the eight MDGs, despite their comprehensiveness.
Focusing exclusively on achievement of the MDGs could possibly interfere
with national timeframes set by developing countries to achieve their
own specific development objectives.
Against that background, it may perhaps be a limitation of the report
that it overlooks the reality of differences in the levels of development
in the world community. Its expectation that all States, though differently
endowed, should engage in the same range of development actions at
the same time in order to qualify for development assistance to achieve
the MDGs, may be unrealistic.
The hard fact of the matter is that while each State forms an integral
part of the global community, it also bears separate distinct responsibilities
to and for its people. The State's indispensable role in protecting
the welfare of its population in the pursuit of social and economic
justice should be complemented and not derailed by externally imposed
goals and priorities. Every nation must always seek to develop itself
by responding to national priorities that have been established by
vigorous national debate and dictated by material circumstances, readily
available resources and the capabilities and expertise of its people.
It would also have been helpful for the report to devote as much attention
to matters of great concern to the developing world - such as the
need for genuinely free and fair trade, poverty-inducing protectionist
practices in developed markets, ways to resolve the debt crisis, effective
arrangements for technology transfer, capacity-building and FDI -
as it did to those issues that occupy the attention of the donor community.
Mr. President,
The report is also at risk of being misunderstood in some quarters
and encountering resistance because of its heavy emphasis on developing
countries' performance to achieve the MDGs, while little emphasis
is placed on others to match those efforts in terms of their commitment.
Like Jamaica, Indonesia too would like to express its concern about
the issues of governance and political conditionalities to qualify
for international support. These conditionalities may hamper the progress
of development and could be viewed as unrealistic and unfair to developing
countries.
Nevertheless, Indonesia sees the positive merits
of the MDGs and knows that their achievement would be a positive contributing
factor to development in every country where they are attained. In
particular, Indonesia attaches importance to poverty eradication and
hunger, ensuring environmental sustainability, and gender equality.
Bearing in mind that these are all development issues of central concern
to developing countries, the report could have elaborated more on
these matters.
The recommendations of the report also stress the vital role of economic
inputs for development. It cites the MDGs as "capital inputs"
for economic growth and further deve10pment. However, the "social
inputs" of the MDGs, in particular gender mainstreaming and better
education for all, were not assessed in great detail. These inputs
are equally important for the improvement of living standards in developing
countries. However, in a world that is becoming ever more interdependent
and globalized, external inputs can also be tapped for social and
economic changes nationally.
Mr. President,
In this context, an important resource for the achievement of the
MDGs not specifically mentioned in the Millennium Project report is
South-South cooperation. At best, it provides little indirect support
to broaden and enhance the landscape of South- South cooperation.
South-South cooperation has been playing its pivotal role in addressing
development problem in developing countries. Yet, it cannot progress
well due to financial shortage faced by the majority of developing
countries. One of the mechanisms devised to overcome the problem is
through tripartite mechanism which involves developing countries and
donor country or international financial institution. This has been
carried out through the Tokyo International Conference on African
Development (TICAD). In this regard, Indonesia has also been actively
taking part in the process through the concept of New Asia Africa
Strategic Partnership (NMSP) under the Asia-Africa Sub-Regional Organizations
Conference (MSROC). Thus, South South Cooperation does not compete
with but actually complements North-South cooperation.
The South-South solidarity which has been nurtured through its various
cooperation is threatened by the introduction of the notion of MDG
"fast-track" countries to qualify for a rapid scale-up of
ODA. The desire to become a fast-track country could introduce an
element of rivalry among developing States in order to gain the status
as one of the countries to be chosen for special treatment.
In conclusion, we hope that both recommendations of the Millennium
Project and High Level Panel will be discussed at length before action
is taken to implement them.
Thank you.